Quantitative Hemodynamic Effects of Heart Rate in Aortic Regurgitation
- 1 September 1971
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 44 (3) , 355-367
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.44.3.355
Abstract
The hemodynamic effect of varying heart rate was studied in eight patients with aortic regurgitation. At the subjects' resting sinus rhythm and at a higher heart rate induced with right atrial pacing, left ventricular and aortic pressures and Fick cardiac outputs (FCO) were measured, and left ventricular biplane angiocardiograms were performed. Left ventricular volumes and left ventricular minute flow (LVMF) were determined from the angiograms. Regurgitant flow was quantitated by subtracting the FCO from LVMF. Increased heart rate produced highly significant reductions in the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and stroke volume. End-diastolic circumferential stress (EDCS) and end-diastolic load (EDL) were abnormally high at resting sinus rhythm and were markedly decreased with increased heart rate. FCO increased, but no significant changes were observed in either the LVMF or the regurgitant flow per minute. Bradycardia in aortic regurgitation may cause ...Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in manPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The contractile state of the heart as expressed by force-velocity relationsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1969
- Wall stress in the normal and hypertrophied human left ventricleThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1968
- Myocardial ischemia after maximal exercise in healthy menAmerican Heart Journal, 1965
- The Influence of Arterial Pressure on Mitral Incompetence in Man *Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1964
- Quantitation of valvular insufficiency in man by angiocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1963
- A clinical study of one hundred cases of severe aortic insufficiencyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1956