Effects of Self-Presentation Strategies on Personality Profiles and their Structure
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 21 (2) , 100-108
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295212001
Abstract
To examine the claim that self presentation distorts the structure of personality dimensions, 370 subjects were asked to respond as job applicants to a measure of the Big Five personality traits and two measures of socially desirable responding (SDR): Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management. They were randomly assigned to respond using one of seven strategies: fake the best possible candidate, fake good without arousing suspicion, play up your good points, respond honestly, be modest, fake bad without arousing suspicion, fake worst. The SDR scales and the Big Five were highly intercorrelated under all strategies except honest responding. Further analyses suggested that the high intercorrelations were due to outliers, not to a true convergence of dimensions. It was concluded that self presentation can either inflate or deflate intercorrelations among evaluative scales. Self presentation in individuals was best diagnosed by the Impression Management and Conscientiousness scales.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The structure of phenotypic personality traits.American Psychologist, 1993
- THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 1991
- Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- The fakeability of the 16 PF, Myers-Briggs and FIRO-B personality measuresPersonality and Individual Differences, 1990
- An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- Style and substance in social desirability scalesEuropean Journal of Personality, 1989
- Response styles and faking on the Basic Personality Inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1986
- Subtlety, information, and faking effects in personality assessmentJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1981
- Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality InventoryBritish Journal of Psychology, 1981
- Social Desirability Factors and the Eysenck Personality InventoryThe Journal of Psychology, 1968