Of Firewalls and Subsidiaries: The Right Stuff for Expanded Bank Activities
Preprint
- 1 February 1998
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The extent and structure of non-banking activities for commercial banks has been a long-standing policy concern for the United States. Recently, three alternative models for the undertaking of non-traditional activities -- the universal bank, the separate subsidiary of the holding company, and the operating subsidiary of the bank -- have come to the fore. After reviewing the history of activity restrictions on banks and providing an analytical framework for considering the appropriate structure, we conclude that the "op sub" approach has modest advantages, but that even it carries substantial risks and requires vigorous monitoring and enforcement.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Dynamic Effects of Forward Guidance ShocksThe Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Research Working Papers, 2016
- De novo banks and lending to small businesses: An empirical analysisJournal of Banking & Finance, 1998
- Bank Runs as an Equilibrium PhenomenonJournal of Political Economy, 1987