Explaining the Variable Utility of Disjointed Incrementalism: Four Propositions
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 74 (2) , 342-353
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1960631
Abstract
Much of mainstream organization theory has been concerned with the implications for organizational design and policy process of high levels of uncertainty or complexity in task environments. Decentralization, disjointed incrementalist decision strategies, and quasi-market coordinative mechanisms have been advanced as rational responses to the complexity of most problems in the socio-political sphere. This article presents and illustrates four conditions which reduce the relative utility of this approach as a means of coping with uncertainty. The propositions are shown to be implicit in the logic of “muddling through,” and are used to help explain/predict the evolution of relatively centralized and planned organizations in certain types of complex task environments.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Best and the BrightestForeign Affairs, 1997
- Nonincremental Policy Making: Notes Toward an Alternative ParadigmAmerican Political Science Review, 1975
- On the Concept of a Self-Correcting OrganizationPublic Administration Review, 1973
- Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and OverlapPublic Administration Review, 1969
- Book Reviews and Notes - Organizations in Action. By James D. Thompson. (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967. Pp. 192. $7.95.) - Methods of Organizational Research. Ed. by Victor H. Vroom. (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967. Pp xii, 211, $3.95.)American Political Science Review, 1968
- Contexts for Change and Strategy: A ReplyPublic Administration Review, 1964
- The Science of "Muddling Through"Public Administration Review, 1959