GOING INTO THE CLOSET WITH SCIENCE
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
- Vol. 20 (3) , 306-330
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124191020003004
Abstract
This analysis extends the notion of occupational stigmatization beyond traditionally low-status, marginal workers to scientists and technicians who conduct biomedical research on animals. Like many “dirty” workers, animal research personnel report that they see themselves as stigmatized by others and sometimes manage information about themselves and their work to avoid unpleasant interactions with those who disapprove of what they do. While information may be managed about their occupational identity through concealment or cautious disclosure, these practices suggest guilt and create a dilemma for some. Nevertheless, the use of information control strategies often seems imperative in the face of a threatening “other,” defined as either reproaching, confrontive, dangerous, and/or distorting.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- FOREWORDJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 2000
- Generating a model of epileptic stigma: The role of qualitative analysisSocial Science & Medicine, 1990
- Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- Authenticity and the disclosure of the information preserve: The case of adoptive parenthoodQualitative Sociology, 1989
- Attitudes toward animal research.American Psychologist, 1988
- GOOD PEOPLE DOING DIRTY WORK: A STUDY OF SOCIAL ISOLATION*Symbolic Interaction, 1984
- In the Closet with Illness: Epilepsy, Stigma Potential and Information ControlSocial Problems, 1980
- Coming Out All Over: Deviants and the Politics of Social ProblemsSocial Problems, 1980
- The Self-Image of the ProstituteThe Sociological Quarterly, 1963
- Becoming a Marihuana UserAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1953