Improving gene set analysis of microarray data by SAM-GS
Open Access
- 5 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Bioinformatics
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-13
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-242
Abstract
Gene-set analysis evaluates the expression of biological pathways, or a priori defined gene sets, rather than that of individual genes, in association with a binary phenotype, and is of great biologic interest in many DNA microarray studies. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) has been applied widely as a tool for gene-set analyses. We describe here some critical problems with GSEA and propose an alternative method by extending the individual-gene analysis method, Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM), to gene-set analyses (SAM-GS). Using a mouse microarray dataset with simulated gene sets, we illustrate that GSEA gives statistical significance to gene sets that have no gene associated with the phenotype (null gene sets), and has very low power to detect gene sets in which half the genes are moderately or strongly associated with the phenotype (truly-associated gene sets). SAM-GS, on the other hand, performs very well. The two methods are also compared in the analyses of three real microarray datasets and relevant pathways, the diverging results of which clearly show advantages of SAM-GS over GSEA, both statistically and biologically. In a microarray study for identifying biological pathways whose gene expressions are associated with p53 mutation in cancer cell lines, we found biologically relevant performance differences between the two methods. Specifically, there are 31 additional pathways identified as significant by SAM-GS over GSEA, that are associated with the presence vs. absence of p53. Of the 31 gene sets, 11 actually involve p53 directly as a member. A further 6 gene sets directly involve the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathways, 3 involve the cell-cycle machinery, and 3 involve cytokines and/or JAK/STAT signaling. Each of these 12 gene sets, then, is in a direct, well-established relationship with aspects of p53 signaling. Of the remaining 8 gene sets, 6 have plausible, if less well established, links with p53. We conclude that GSEA has important limitations as a gene-set analysis approach for microarray experiments for identifying biological pathways associated with a binary phenotype. As an alternative statistically-sound method, we propose SAM-GS. A free Excel Add-In for performing SAM-GS is available for public use.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issuesBioinformatics, 2007
- Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profilesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetesNature Genetics, 2003
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery RatesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Cross-talk between Akt, p53 and Mdm2: possible implications for the regulation of apoptosisOncogene, 2002
- Human Dkk-1, a gene encoding a Wnt antagonist, responds to DNA damage and its overexpression sensitizes brain tumor cells to apoptosis following alkylation damage of DNAOncogene, 2002
- Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation responseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Isolation of a new gene from the distal short arm of the human X chromosome that escapes X-inactivationHuman Molecular Genetics, 1992
- A High Dimensional Two Sample Significance TestThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958
- Randomization Tests for a Multivariate Two-Sample ProblemJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958