Advance Notice and Unemployment: New Evidence from the 1988 Displaced Worker Survey
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in ILR Review
- Vol. 45 (4) , 645-664
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399204500402
Abstract
This paper examines how advance notice of layoff affects the incidence and duration of unemployment following displacement. The authors use the Displaced Worker Survey for 1988, which, unlike earlier surveys in the series, contains information on written notice. The results are mixed. Longer written notice may more than double the proportion of white-collar workers who move directly to new employment. But written notice has no such positive effects for blue-collar workers, regardless of its length. Informal (unwritten) notice benefits male workers, either by improving their chances of avoiding unemployment (white-collar men) or by reducing the average spell of unemployment (blue-collar men).Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advance Notice and Postdisplacement JoblessnessJournal of Labor Economics, 1992
- Advance Notice: From Voluntary Exchange to Mandated BenefitsIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1992
- The Impact of Advance Notice of Plant Closings on Earnings and the Probability of UnemploymentILR Review, 1991
- Does advance notice facilitate better job matches?Economics Letters, 1991
- The Controversy Over Advance Notice Legislation in the United StatesBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1989
- The Value of Advance Notice of Worker DisplacementSouthern Economic Journal, 1989
- International Trade and the Labor Market Experience of Displaced WorkersILR Review, 1988
- The Effect of Advance Notification of Plant Closings on UnemploymentILR Review, 1987
- Duration of Joblessness Following DisplacementIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1987
- On the Distributional Shape of Unemployment DurationThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987