THE DURATION OF THE RESPONSE OF CATTLE TO INOCULATION WITH ATYPICAL MYCOBACTERIA

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
SUMMARY Each of 4 strains of atypical mycobacteria was inoculated into 2 cattle and the responses of the cattle were studied over the following 52 weeks. Each strain was injected subcutaneously into one animal and into a mesenteric lymph node of another.Within 7 days palpable lesions were produced at the sites of subcutaneous inoculation in response to all the strains. After intervals varying from 3 to 26 weeks, lesions due to 3 of the strains were no longer palpable. The lesion produced in response to the fourth strain, a non‐agglutinable serotype of Mycobacterium intracellulare, was still palpable at necropsy, 52 weeks post‐inoculation (PI). Of the 8 cattle inoculated with mycobacteria, the latter was the only animal that had a lesion with features consistent with a mycobacterial infection and from which mycobacteria were isolated.The inoculated cattle and 4 uninoculated control cattle were turberculin tested on 8 occasions during the post‐inoculation period. Bovine purified protein derivative (PPD), avian PPD and PPD tuberculins prepared from each of the atypical mycobacteria were used. In inoculated cattle, sensitivity to both avian and bovine PPD was short lived, significant levels not persisting in any animal beyond 16 weeks PI.From the results of intradermal tests on the control cattle, a 95% confidence interval for their response to any of the 6 tuberculins used, was found to be ±1.36mm. On this basis all inoculated cattle developed sensitivity to the homologous tuberculin. The animal with mycobacterial granuloma at the subcutaneous inoculation site at necropsy had never developed significant levels of sensitivity to bovine PPD, had not shown significant levels of avian sensitivity after week 16 PI nor had it shown homologous sensitivity after week 22 PI.In all animals the level of sensitivity to bovine PPD decreased between successive tests. This fact could be used to clarify the status of a reactor if non‐specific bovine sensitivity was suspected. Alternatively, the comparative intradermal tuberculin test using both bovine and avian PPD may be employed.