Strengthening Qualitative Studies and Reports
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Social Work Education
- Vol. 33 (1) , 185-197
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1997.10778862
Abstract
This article examines six criteria for conducting qualitative research and evaluating qualitative research reports in social work: (1) identification of the chosen philosophy/epistemology, (2) identification of audience and objectives, (3) specification of the study method, (4) identification of biases, (5) maintenance of social work ethics, and (6) assurance of consistency between conclusions and study philosophy, objectives, and presented data. Throughout, the author emphasizes the need to examine potentially disconfirming data in all qualitative research. These criteria are intended to guide qualitative researchers, inform the teaching of qualitative research methods, and aid review of qualitative research reports.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructivism: An approach to clinical practice∗Smith College Studies in Social Work, 1993
- Children in a Careless SocietySocial Work, 1990
- The heuristic paradigm: A unifying and comprehensive approach to social work researchSmith College Studies in Social Work, 1989
- Research InterviewingPublished by Harvard University Press ,1986
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- PragmaticsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983