Patient Involvement in Surgery Treatment Decisions for Breast Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 20 August 2005
- journal article
- breast cancer
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (24) , 5526-5533
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.06.217
Abstract
Purpose: High rates of mastectomy and marked regional variations have motivated lingering concerns about overtreatment and failure to involve women in treatment decisions. We examined the relationship between patient involvement in decision making and type of surgical treatment for women with breast cancer. Methods: All women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and a 20% random sample of women with invasive breast cancer aged 79 years and younger who were diagnosed in 2002 and reported to the Detroit and Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were identified and surveyed shortly after receipt of surgical treatment (response rate, 77.4%; n = 1,844). Results: Mean age was 60.1 years; 70.2% of the women were white, 18.0% were African American, and 11.8% were from other ethnic groups. Overall, 30.2% of women received mastectomy as initial treatment. Most women reported that they made the surgical decision (41.0%) or that the decision was shared (37.1%); 21.9% of patients reported that their surgeon made the decision with or without their input. Among white women, only 5.3% of patients whose surgeon made the decision received mastectomy compared with 16.8% of women who shared the decision and 27.0% of women who made the decision (P < .001, adjusted for clinical factors, predisposing factors, and number of surgeons visited). However, this association was not observed for African American women (Wald test 10.0, P = .041). Conclusion: Most women reported that they made or shared the decision about surgical treatment. More patient involvement in decision making was associated with greater use of mastectomy. Racial differences in the association of involvement with receipt of treatment suggest that the decision-making process varies by racial groups.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the BreastJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Breast cancer treatment in clinical practice compared to best evidence and practice guidelinesBritish Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centresBMJ, 2002
- Standard for Breast Conservation Therapy in the Management of Invasive Breast CarcinomaCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002
- Impact of breast cancer treatment guidelines on surgeon practice patterns: Results of a hospital-based interventionSurgery, 2000
- Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older womenCancer, 2000
- Underutilization of Breast-Conserving Therapy in a Predominantly Rural Population: Need for Improved Surgeon and Public EducationClinical Breast Cancer, 2000
- Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinomaCancer, 1999
- Minimal Increase in Use of Breast-Conserving Surgery from 1986 to 1990Medical Care, 1996
- Geographic Variation in the Use of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992