V. O, key's “the lack of a budgetary theory”: Where are we now?
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Public Administration
- Vol. 7 (4) , 345-374
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01900698508524496
Abstract
V. O. Key's essay, “The Lack of a Budgetary Theory,” published in 1940, is considered one of the true classics of public budgeting. The reason is that he posed what many will agree is the question for budgetary decision- making: On what basis shall it be decided to allocate x dollars to activity A instead of activity B? Key's quest for an allocation formula has remained largely unfulfilled. Nevertheless, his conclusion about the influence of economics in the theory and practice of budgeting cannot be sustained. Nor can the assertion that budgetary theory has been advanced be defended given the history of incrementalism. However, as incremental theory becomes increasingly untenable as a complete theory of budgeting, we find ourselves returning to the theme of Key's classic essay. If, as Key tells us at the end of his essay, budgets are reflections of political philosophy, then perhaps the search for an allocation formula to determine how best to distribute budgetary resources is illusory.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cutback BudgetingJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1985
- Congress Cuts the Budget: The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1981Public Budgeting & Finance, 1982
- On Change: Or, There is No Magic Size for An IncrementPolitical Studies, 1979
- A Typology of Budgetary EnvironmentsAdministration & Society, 1979
- Agency Strategies and Executive Review: The Hidden Politics of BudgetingPublic Administration Review, 1978