Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia
Open Access
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 59 (11) , 934-940
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.035931
Abstract
Objective: To estimate variation between small areas in the levels of walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and overall physical activity and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Methods: All census collector districts (CCDs) in the 20 innermost local government areas in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, were identified and ranked by the percentage of low income households (<$400/week) living in the CCD. Fifty CCDs were randomly selected from the least, middle, and most disadvantaged septiles of the ranked CCDs and 2349 residents (58.7% participation rate) participated in a cross sectional postal survey about physical activity. Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for extrabinomial variation) was used to estimate area level variation in walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and in overall physical activity participation, and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Results: There were significant variations between CCDs in all activities and in overall physical participation in age and sex adjusted models; however, after adjustment for individual SES (income, occupation, education) and area level socioeconomic disadvantage, significant differences remained only for walking (p = 0.004), cycling (p = 0.003), and swimming (p = 0.024). Living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of jogging and of having overall physical activity levels that were sufficiently active for health; these effects remained after adjustment for individual socioeconomic status (sufficiently active: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90 and jogging: OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94). Conclusion: These research findings support the need to focus on improving local environments to increase physical activity participation.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic reviewBMJ, 2004
- Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agendaPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Estimating neighborhood health effects: the challenges of causal inference in a complex worldSocial Science & Medicine, 2004
- Factors of the Physical Environment Associated with Walking and BicyclingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004
- Ecological effects in multi-level studiesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter?Social Science & Medicine, 2000
- Excess mortality from avoidable and non-avoidable causes in men of low socioeconomic status: a prospective study in KoreaJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Prevalence of physical inactivity and its relation to social class in U.S. adults: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988???1994Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999
- Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports MedicineJAMA, 1995