Screening of developmental disorders in five-year-olds using the FTF (Five to Fifteen) questionnaire: a validation study
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Vol. 13 (S3) , iii31-iii38
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-3005-z
Abstract
The study examined the validity of the Five to Fifteen (FTF) questionnaire in detecting developmental disorders in five-year-old children. A pilot study (N=70) was first undertaken to try out a translation of the FTF into Finnish. Subsequently, FTF questionnaires were mailed to parents of all five-year-old children from specified health-care districts in Vantaa, Finland. A total of 769 questionnaires (60%) were completed and returned. Children scoring above a cut-off value in any domain were considered at risk for having developmental disorders (the Risk Group; N=90). A Control Group was formed by randomly selecting 30 children who did not score above the threshold value in any domain. The children from the Risk Group and the Control Group were called to individual neuropsychological assessments. All invited children attended the assessments. The parts of the FTF that assess fine motor skills, executive functions (including attention and impulsivity), perception, memory, and language were used for this study. The external criterion measure was the NEPSY, a neuropsychological assessment instrument. Results demonstrated that the five FTF Domain Scores used in this study correlated significantly with the corresponding NEPSY Domain Scores. Second, the Risk Group obtained significantly poorer scores on the NEPSY than the Control Group. Third, on a cross-tabulation a very high rate of positive hits (93 %) was obtained as well as a very low rate of misses (7 %), indicating a very good sensitivity. However, there were a large percentage of false positives (63 %), indicating that specificity was not so good. Evidently, parents may report concerns related to the young child’s development even when neuropsychological assessments do not indicate significant disorders. On the whole, the findings supported the validity of the FTF as a developmental screening instrument.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The FTF (Five to Fifteen): the development of a parent questionnaire for the assessment of ADHD and comorbid conditionsEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004
- TEST REVIEW Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive FunctionChild Neuropsychology, 2000
- Visual‐perceptual and phonological factors in the acquisition of literacy among children with congenital developmental coordination disorderDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1997
- Minnesota Child Development Inventory: A normative study.Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 1995
- An Analysis of Two Discrepancy-based Models and a Processing-Deficit Approach in Identifying Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1995
- Maternal estimates of developmental age in preschool childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- A Comparison of Neuropsychological Test Profiles of Children with Attention Deficit—Hyperactivity Disorder and/or Learning DisorderJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1994
- Language Abilities, Reading Acquisition, and Developmental DyslexiaJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1992
- Children with Motor Problems (Clumsy Children)Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1986
- PERCEPTUAL, MOTOR AND ATTENTIONAL DEFICITS IN SEVEN‐YEAR‐OLD CHILDREN: NEUROLOGICAL AND NEURODEVELOPMENTAL ASPECTSDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1983