Combination cyclophosphamide and etoposide in treatment of small Cell Lung Cancer
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy
- Vol. 7 (1) , 31-34
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03000488
Abstract
Thirty-one patients with histologically proven small cell lung cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide 1 gm-2 and etoposide (VP16-213) 125 mg m-2 both intravenously on day 1 followed by etoposide 250 mg m-2 orally on days 2-3 for a maximum of six courses at 3 weekly intervals. Fourteen patients had limited and 17 patients had extensive disease. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. Objective response was observed in 18 patients (58%) with 6 (19%) complete and 12 (39%) partial responses. Median survival of the entire group of patients was 30 weeks. There was significant survival benefit among the responders (P < 0.005) when compared with non-responders. One patient (3.3%) developed grade 4 while 60% of patients developed grade 1-2 haematological toxicity. Other side effects were relatively mild. We conclude that combination cyclophosphamide and etoposide was active in small cell lung cancer and relatively well tolerated.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small cell lung cancer 1973–1983: Early progress and recent obstaclesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1984
- Role of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a consensus report of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer workshop.1983
- COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR SMALL CELL-CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG - CONTINUOUS VERSUS ALTERNATING NON-CROSS-RESISTANT COMBINATIONS1982
- CYCLIC ALTERNATING COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA1979
- Treatment of oat cell carcinoma of the lung: complete remissions, acceptable complications, and improved survival.BMJ, 1978
- Chemotherapy of small cell carcinoma of the lung with V. P. 16–213Cancer, 1978
- Treatment of bronchogenic carcinoma: II. Small cellCancer Treatment Reviews, 1977