STATISTICAL COVARIANCE AS A MEASURE OF PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIP
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cladistics
- Vol. 2 (3) , 297-317
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1986.tb00454.x
Abstract
- The method of parsimony in phylogenetic inference is often taken to mean two things: (1) that one should favor the genealogical hypothesis that minimizes the required number of homoplasies (matchings of independently evolved derived character states), and (2) that symplesiomorphies (matchings of primitive character states) have little or no evidential value for phylogenetic relationship. This paper shows both theses to be false by undermining recent likelihood arguments for them and by providing a more secure likelihood proof of a new method, which is incompatible with both (1) and (2).Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A LIKELIHOOD JUSTIFICATION OF PARSIMONYCladistics, 1985
- Common Cause ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 1984
- Parsimony in Systematics: Philosophical IssuesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1983
- A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibilityBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1981
- Bayesian Conditionalisation and the Principle of Minimum InformationThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1980
- Alternative Methods of Phylogenetic Inference and Their InterrelationshipSystematic Zoology, 1979
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978