Effect of Prenatal Diagnosis on Epidemiologic Studies of Birth Defects
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 11 (6) , 695-699
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200011000-00014
Abstract
Prenatal diagnostic technology makes it possible to offer women the option of electively terminating pregnancies affected by birth defects. Excluding these pregnancies from epidemiologic studies may affect study results. We explored this effect using examples from the literature. We calculated the bias in the odds ratio caused by excluding prenatally diagnosed pregnancies when the exposure of interest is not correlated with the likelihood of terminating an affected pregnancy and when it is correlated with an increase or decrease in this likelihood. We assumed that control infants did not have birth defects. When the exposure is not associated with the likelihood of a pregnancy termination, studies excluding terminations suffer a loss of precision. When the exposure is associated with an increase or decrease in this likelihood, the odds ratios are biased toward or away from the null, respectively. The magnitude of the bias will vary according to characteristics of the study population such as the prevalence of the exposure and the frequency with which prenatal diagnosis and elective termination are used. Whenever possible, pregnancies terminated after prenatal diagnosis must be included in epidemiologic studies.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benzodiazepine use in pregnancy and major malformations or oral cleftsBMJ, 1999
- Impact of Demographic Factors on Prenatal Diagnosis and Elective Pregnancy Termination because of Abdominal Wall Defects, Hawaii, 1986–1997Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1999
- Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Elective Termination on Prevalence and Risk Estimates of Neural Tube Defects in California, 1989-1991American Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies during the second trimester of pregnancy: Their characterization and delineation of defects in pregnancies at riskPrenatal Diagnosis, 1991
- The Absence of a Relation between the Periconceptional Use of Vitamins and Neural-Tube DefectsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Antenatal ultrasonography to detect fetal renal abnormalities: a prospective screening programme.BMJ, 1989
- Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital UropathiesFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1989
- Periconceptional use of multivitamins and the occurrence of neural tube defectsJAMA, 1988
- Computing an Exact Confidence Interval for the Common Odds Ratio in Several 2 × 2 Contingency TablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1985