A comparative, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with evidence of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal Of Impotence Research
- Vol. 16 (1) , 2-7
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901119
Abstract
The aim of the study was to establish and compare the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). In all, 43 men with ED and postinjection max penile systolic velocity 2, Pp=0.04). Satisfaction was reported by 76.75 and 13.95% of patients for sildenafil and apomorphine, respectively, but 20.9% were not satisfied with any of the two drugs. In conclusion, this study provides clear evidence that sildenafil, even at 50 mg dose, is more effective than apomorphine 3 mg in men with arteriogenic ED. The fact that one out of five patients is not satisfied with the above-studied drugs shows that new oral agents need to be evaluated for the treatment of this disorder.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diabetes and sexual function in older adults: results of an international surveyBritish Journal of Diabetes, 2002
- Patient Choice is Critical in Managing Erectile DysfunctionEuropean Urology Supplements, 2002
- Safety and Tolerability of Apomorphine SL in Men with Cardiovascular DisordersEuropean Urology Supplements, 2002
- Cross-Study Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Apomorphine SL 2 and 3 mg:: Pooled Data from Three Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Crossover StudiesEuropean Urology Supplements, 2002
- Adverse Events and Patient Tolerability of Apomorphine SL 2 and 3 mg: A Cross-Study Analysis of Phase II and III StudiesEuropean Urology Supplements, 2002
- Safety and tolerability of apomorphine SL (Uprima®)International Journal Of Impotence Research, 2001
- Oral Sildenafil in the Treatment of Erectile DysfunctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Repetition of color Doppler ultrasonography: is it necessary?International Journal Of Impotence Research, 1998
- Outcome Analysis of Goal Directed Therapy for ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1996
- NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on ImpotenceJAMA, 1993