TRENDS TOWARD LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY AT A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 173 (2) , 547-551
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000148940.23986.8b
Abstract
Purpose: For proper indications at university hospitals laparoscopic nephrectomy is often considered the standard of care. At community hospitals past surveys have not demonstrated this change. We describe the changing practice patterns of performing laparoscopic nephrectomies in indicated patients at our community hospital. We reviewed our data on monitoring our training program. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 381 consecutive complete nephrectomies performed at our institution from February 2000 to December 2003, including 62 live donor nephrectomies. Patient age, pathological size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration to solid food intake and duration of hospitalization were compared between open nephrectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy groups using the Wilcoxon 2-sample test. Surgical practice and surgeon characteristics were also described. Results: Patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy demonstrated superior postoperative recovery with earlier return to solid diet and shorter hospitalization. The 2 groups were similar in regard to major complication rates. The number of laparoscopic nephrectomies increased annually, while the number of open nephrectomies decreased. The number of laparoscopic urologists increased annually. More importantly laparoscopic urologists performed an increasing number of nephrectomies, while nonlaparoscopic urologists faced a decrease in the number of nephrectomies performed. There appeared to be little evidence of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy as a bridge to learning standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: Our training paradigm has safely and effectively trained community urologists to perform laparoscopic nephrectomies. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is now considered a standard treatment option along with conventional open surgery and it should be offered to the patient in the medical setting. Although fellowship trained urologists can certainly add expertise to any program, community based hospitals do not have to depend on them.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical treatment of renal neoplasia: evolving toward a laparoscopic standard of careUrology, 2003
- Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic efficacyUrologic Clinics of North America, 2003
- LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: THE FIRST 100 CASESJournal of Urology, 2002
- LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMOR: DUPLICATING OPEN SURGICAL TECHNIQUESJournal of Urology, 2002
- Improved recipient results after 5 years of performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomyTransplantation Proceedings, 2001
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephropexyUrologic Clinics of North America, 2001
- LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: A 9-YEAR EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2000
- Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experienceUrology, 1999
- LEARNING CURVE AND CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY IN CASES OF LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY AND NEPHRECTOMYJournal of Urology, 1998
- Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Initial Case ReportJournal of Urology, 1991