Nursing research: is there an obligation on subjects to participate?
- 1 November 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 16 (11) , 1284-1289
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01555.x
Abstract
Studies of the ethics of medical and nursing research have focused principally on the more practical issues to do with the research process, such as informed consent and protection of subjects from harm. A more fundamental question, which is often overlooked, is whether individuals are under any sort of obligation to participate as subjects in nursing research in the first place. The conclusions which nurses reach on this issue will help establish the overall moral climate in which nursing research is conducted. In this paper, three models of such an obligation are explored; one based on a notion of payment, one centred in the social contract, and one which seeks to establish an unconditional obligation. Each of these is seen to be flawed in various respects. The delicate and potentially conflicting relationship between obligation and consent is then briefly examined. In conclusion, it is argued that the notion of a 'moral claim' on participation in research is an ethically more acceptable approach than any strict sense of obligation.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nursing research in the United States: The protection of human subjectsInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 1990
- Ethical Considerations for Nurses in Biomedical ResearchJournal of Neuroscience Nursing, 1990
- Ethical problems in clinical research: The need for empirical studies of the clinical trials processJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Individual vs aggregate good: ethical tension in nursing practiceInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 1985
- Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the publicJAMA, 1982
- The Social Imperatives of Medical ResearchScience, 1977
- Meditation on a Forest PathNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977