Share Option Rewards and Managerial Performance: an Abnormal Performance Index Model
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Accounting and Business Research
- Vol. 19 (75) , 255-266
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1989.9728855
Abstract
Managerial share option schemes are widely used as a means of motivating and rewarding corporate performance. Such schemes normally adopt a static exercise price; when additional exercise criteria are employed they are often based on earnings per share. A static exercise price does not adjust for economic changes outside the control of management, and earnings per share hurdles have similar limitations. This paper presents a ‘phantom’ managerial option based on relative performance, together with a pricing model for the valuation of the option. The option is developed and demonstrated using an abnormal performance index. It offers a structure which could be used for different forms of performance measurement, and resolves some important criticisms of the reward and incentive effects of traditional schemes.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- An Empirical Investigation of the Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate ExecutivesJournal of Accounting Research, 1986
- The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisionsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1985
- Moral Hazard in TeamsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1982
- Agency Problems and the Theory of the FirmJournal of Political Economy, 1980
- Economically Optimal Performance Evaluation and Control SystemsJournal of Accounting Research, 1980
- Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent RelationshipThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976
- The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 1973
- A Path Goal Theory of Leader EffectivenessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1971