Assessment of osteoporosis-website quality
- 31 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Osteoporosis International
- Vol. 17 (5) , 741-752
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0042-5
Abstract
The Internet provides great opportunities for patient healthcare education, but poses risks that inaccurate, outdated, or harmful information will be disseminated. Osteoporosis is a topic of great interest to patients, many of whom use the Internet to obtain medical information. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate measurement tools to determine the quality of osteoporosis websites for patients. Quality indicators in the categories of content, credibility, navigability, currency, and readability were incorporated into separate evaluation tools for healthcare professionals and for patients. Websites were selected from an Internet search. Interobserver reliability and validity were assessed, and a sample of osteoporosis websites was evaluated by an osteoporosis nurse educator and compared to patient evaluations. For the quality indicators, there was 79% agreement between the osteoporosis nurse educators, 88% agreement between the physician osteoporosis experts, and 71% agreement comparing the osteoporosis nurse educators to the physician osteoporosis experts. Quality scores for evaluated websites ranged from 18-96 (maximum possible=100), with a mean of 66. Websites with Uniform Resource Locator (URL) suffix .com scored significantly lower compared to those with .gov (P<0.05), .edu (P<0.01), and .org (P<0.01). Healthcare professionals and patients were in agreement on the quality of the highest-rated websites, with less agreement for lower-rated websites. In summary, a tool for measuring the quality of medical websites was developed and evaluated. Significant variability in osteoporosis-website quality was observed. Higher-quality scores were associated with a higher level of search engine match and specific URL suffixes. A validated tool for evaluating medical websites may have value in assisting patients to select high-quality osteoporosis educational information on the Internet, and may encourage website developers to improve the quality of information that is provided.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Website quality assessment: Mistaking apples for orangesFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Quality of fertility clinic websitesFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use?International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2004
- Quality-related variables at hepatological websitesDigestive and Liver Disease, 2004
- Efficacy of Quality Criteria to Identify Potentially Harmful Information: A Cross-sectional Survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Web SitesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2004
- Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action AgendaJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2004
- The Internet for Medical Information About Cancer: Help or Hindrance?Psychosomatics, 2003
- Back Pain OnlineSpine, 2003
- Bone Quality: Getting Closer to a DefinitionJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2002
- Review Of Internet Health Information Quality InitiativesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2001