Etiology and management of fecal incontinence
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 36 (1) , 77-97
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02050307
Abstract
Fecal incontinence is a challenging condition of diverse etiology and devastating psychosocial impact. Multiple mechanisms may be involved in its pathophysiology, such as altered stool consistency and delivery of contents to the rectum, abnormal rectal capacity or compliance, decreased anorectal sensation, and pelvic floor or anal sphincter dysfunction. A detailed clinical history and physical examination are essential. Anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve latency studies, and electromyography are part of the standard primary evaluation. The evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence may require tests such as cinedefecography, spinal latencies, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity. These tests permit both objective assessment and focused therapy. Appropriate treatment options include biofeedback and sphincteroplasty. Biofeedback has resulted in 90 percent reduction in episodes of incontinence in over 60 percent of patients. Overlapping anterior sphincteroplasty has been associated with good to excellent results in 70 to 90 percent of patients. The common denominator between the medical and surgical treatment groups is the necessity of pretreatment physiologic assessment. It is the results of these tests that permit optimal therapeutic assignment. For example, pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML) are the most important predictor factor of functional outcome. However, even the most experienced examiner's digit cannot assess PNTML. In the absence of pudendal neuropathy, sphincteroplasty is an excellent option. If neuropathy exists, however, then postanal or total pelvic floor repair remain viable surgical options for the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. In the absence of an adequate sphincter muscle, encirclement procedures using synthetic materials or muscle transfer techniques might be considered. Implantation of a stimulating electrode into the gracilis neosphincter and artificial sphincter implantation are other valid alternatives. The final therapeutic option is fecal diversion. This article reviews the current status of the etiology and incidence of incontinence as well as the evaluation and treatment of this disabling condition.Keywords
This publication has 210 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: A pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressuresDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1987
- Urgency and fecal soiling in people with bowel dysfunctionDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1986
- Gracilis muscle transposition for anal incontinence: Late resultsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Diagnosis of disturbances of continence and defecationDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1984
- Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgencyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1982
- Rectal sphincter reconstruction in perineal colostomies after abdominoperineal resection for cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- The functional importance of the internal anal sphincterBritish Journal of Surgery, 1964