Staging Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 127 (11) , 1294-1297
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420110036009
Abstract
• Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection has proven to be a reliable, less-invasive method for staging prostate cancer. Presently, no clear indications for its performance prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy are available. With the purpose of identifying clinical parameters by which to better select patients who would benefit from laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, we chose to perform the procedure only in patients considered at high risk for nodal metastasis: clinical stages B2 or C, poorly differentiated tumors, and/or a serum prostatic-specific antigen level of more than 20 ng/dL. We compared the results with those of patients not meeting such parameters. Of 80 men receiving treatment for clinically localized disease, 30 (38%) fulfilled one or more of the criteria. When considering the individual clinical parameters, clinical stage was predictive of nodal involvement in five (26%) of 19 patients, grade was predictive in three (37.5%) of eight patients, and prostatic-specific antigen level was predictive in six (40%) of 15 patients. Statistical analysis confirmed that the prostatic-specific antigen level was the single best predictor of nodal involvement. However, better predictive values were obtained when the different criteria were combined. Nodal involvement was predicted most consistently by a combination of clinical stage and prostatic-specific antigen level. (Arch Surg. 1992;127:1294-1297)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Staging Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Comparison of Results with Open Pelvic LymphadenectomyJournal of Urology, 1992
- Transperitoneal Endosurgical Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1991
- Prostate Specific Antigen: A Critical Assessment of the Most Useful Tumor Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1991
- Correlation of Clinical Stage, Serum Prostatic Acid Phosphatase and Preoperative Gleason Grade with Final Pathological Stage in 275 Patients with Clinically Localized Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1987
- Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging.Radiology, 1987
- Morbidity From Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Staging Carcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1983
- Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging, and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate.Radiology, 1981
- Experience with Gleason’s Histopathologic Grading in Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1980
- Predictors of Lymphatic Spread in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Uro-Oncology Research Group StudyJournal of Urology, 1980
- Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical StagingJournal of Urology, 1974