Agreement between the Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring device and the manual mercury sphygmomanometer: an assessment under field conditions in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 50 (2) , 218-222
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.50.2.218
Abstract
To assess agreement between two Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring devices (referred to as machines A and B) and two manual mercury sphygmomanometers. A 'Y' connector attached each Takeda UA-731 to a manual mercury sphygmomanometer. Simultaneous measurements were made on adult subjects. A population based cardiovascular disease survey in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Measurements on machine A were compared in 71 individuals (all women), and on machine B in 75 individuals (9 men, 66 women). The age range of subjects was 28 to 76 years and median ages were 59 years for machine A and 50 years for machine B. Blood pressure (mmHg) ranged from 72 to 212 systolic and 44 to 102 diastolic. Both Takedas gave significantly lower readings than the manual devices for systolic and diastolic pressures: differences were mean (SD: 95% CI) 3.7 mmHg (6.5: 2.2, 5.2) for machine A systolic, 2.3 mmHg (4.5: 1.3, 3.4) machine A diastolic; 1.8 mmHg (6.2: 0.4, 3.3) machine B systolic, and 1.8 (4.4: 0.8, 2.8) machine B diastolic. On the British Hypertension Society criteria, machine A was graded C on systolic measurements and B on diastolic; machine B was graded B on both systolic and diastolic measurements. The performance of these machines compares favourably with the Dinamap 8100, recently adopted for survey work by the Department of Health. The Takeda UA-731 looks promising for epidemiological survey work but before it can be fully recommended further evaluations are needed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?1995
- A review of common errors in the indirect measurement of blood pressure. Sphygmomanometry.1993
- A Review of Common Errors in the Indirect Measurement of Blood PressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Short report: An outline of the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devicesJournal Of Hypertension, 1993
- Comparative accuracy of six ambulatory devices according to blood pressure levelsJournal Of Hypertension, 1993
- National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers.Hypertension, 1993
- The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1992
- The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systemsJournal Of Hypertension, 1990
- EVALUATION OF THE DINAMAP BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITOR IN AN AMBULATORY PRIMARY CARE SETTING1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986