Prognostic Value of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements in Pregnancy
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hypertension
- Vol. 40 (3) , 298-303
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000028978.99648.d0
Abstract
With the objective to assess the prognostic value of office values as compared with ambulatory monitoring in pregnancy, we analyzed 2430 blood pressure series systematically sampled from 403 untreated pregnant women for 48 consecutive hours every 4 weeks from the first visit to the hospital until delivery. Women were divided into 5 groups: “detected” gestational hypertension, women with office blood pressures >140/90 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation and hyperbaric index (area of blood pressure excess above the upper limit of a time-specified tolerance interval) consistently above the threshold for diagnosing hypertension in pregnancy; “undetected” gestational hypertension, office values <140/90 mm Hg but hyperbaric index above the threshold for diagnosis; normotension, both office values and hyperbaric index below the thresholds for diagnosis; white coat hypertension, women with recorded diagnosis of gestational hypertension but hyperbaric index consistently below the threshold for diagnosis; and preeclampsia, defined as gestational hypertension and proteinuria. Results indicate small and nonsignificant differences in 24-hour mean of ambulatory pressures between “detected” and “undetected” gestational hypertension at all stages of pregnancy, in contrast with highly significant differences between these two groups and normotensive pregnancies. Average office blood pressure values were similar for preeclampsia, “detected,” and “undetected” gestational hypertension. The hyperbaric index was, however, significantly higher for women with preeclampsia after 20 weeks of gestation as compared with all other groups and higher for women with either “detected” or “undetected” gestational hypertension as compared with normotensive pregnant women. The incidence of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation were similar for “detected” and “undetected” gestational hypertension but significantly lower for normotensive women. In pregnancy, the hyperbaric index derived from ambulatory monitoring is markedly superior to office measurements for diagnosis of what should be truly considered gestational hypertension, as well as for prediction of the outcome of pregnancy.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hypertension in pregnancy: Which method of blood pressure measurement is most predictive of outcome?Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancyFetal and Maternal Medicine Review, 1998
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: What is normal?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Whatʼs in a name? Problems with the classification of hypertension in pregnancyJournal Of Hypertension, 1997
- Second trimester ambulatory blood pressure in nulliparous pregnancy: a useful screening test for pre‐eclampsia?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Chronolab: An Interactive Software Package for Chronobiologic Time Series Analysis Written for the Macintosh ComputerChronobiology International, 1992
- Office assessment of coronary candidates and risk factor insights from the Framingham studyJournal Of Hypertension, 1991
- National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group Report on High Blood Pressure in PregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990
- Pitfalls in diagnosis and management of preeclampsiaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988