Rarefaction and rarefiction—the use and abuse of a method in paleoecology
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Paleobiology
- Vol. 5 (4) , 423-434
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300016924
Abstract
Rarefaction is a method for comparing community diversities that has consistently been abused by paleoecologists: here its assumptions are clarified and advice given on its application. Rarefaction should be restricted to comparison of collections from communities that are taxonomically similar and from similar habitats: the collections should have been obtained by using standardised procedures. The rarefaction curve is a graph of the estimated species richness of sub-samples drawn from a collection, plotted against the size of sub-sample: it is a deterministic transform of the collection's species-abundance distribution. Although rarefaction curves can be compared statistically, it may be more efficient to compare the species-abundance distributions directly. Both types of comparison are discussed in detail.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sampling Properties of a Family of Diversity MeasuresPublished by JSTOR ,1977
- A method and fortran program for quantitative sampling in paleontologyComputers & Geosciences, 1976
- Explicit Calculation of the Rarefaction Diversity Measurement and the Determination of Sufficient Sample SizeEcology, 1975
- The Measurement of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1974
- Properties of the Rarefaction Diversity MeasurementThe American Naturalist, 1972
- Diversity: A Sampling StudyThe American Naturalist, 1972
- The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative ParametersEcology, 1971
- Marine Benthic Diversity: A Comparative StudyThe American Naturalist, 1968
- The Structure of Diatom Communities in Similar Ecological ConditionsThe American Naturalist, 1968
- An Index of Diversity and the Relation of Certain Concepts to DiversityEcology, 1967