Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy

This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:

• Routine ultrasound dating has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method
  BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
• Birth weight, prematurity and accuracy of gestational age
  International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1997
• A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15 000 examinations
  Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
• Estimating the date of confinement: Ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
• Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low‐risk population
  Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
• Birth-Weight-for-Gestational-Age Patterns by Race, Sex, and Parity in the United States Population
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
• Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: the effect of routine ultrasound scan determination of gestational age and adjustment for maternal weight
  BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
• Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignment
  Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1991
• Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age
  BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
• Reliability of Ultrasound Fetometry in Estimating Gestational Age in the Second Trimester
  Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986