Carbon Capture Retrofits and the Cost of Regulatory Uncertainty
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Energy Journal
- Vol. 28 (4) , 101-128
- https://doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol28-no4-5
Abstract
Power generation firms confront impending replacement of an aging coal-fired fleet in a business environment characterized by volatile natural gas prices and uncertain carbon regulation. We develop a stochastic dynamic programming model of firm investment decisions that minimizes the expected present value of future power generation costs under uncertain natural gas and carbon prices. We explore the implications of regulatory uncertainty on generation technology choice and the optimal timing of investment, and assess the implications of these choices for regulators. We find that interaction of regulatory uncertainty with irreversible investment always raises the social cost of carbon abatement. Further, the social cost of regulatory uncertainty is strongly dependent on the relative competitiveness of IGCC plants, for which the cost of later carbon capture retrofits is comparatively small, and on the firm’s ability to use investments in natural gas generation as a transitional strategy to manage carbon regulation uncertainty. Without highly competitive IGCC or low gas prices, regulatory uncertainty can increase the expected social cost of reducing emissions by 40 to 60%.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The European power plant infrastructure—Presentation of the Chalmers energy infrastructure database with applicationsEnergy Policy, 2007
- Future carbon regulations and current investments in alternative coal-fired power plant technologiesEnergy Policy, 2007
- ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND SECURITYAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2004
- Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learningEnergy, 2004
- Fossil electricity and CO2 sequestration: how natural gas prices, initial conditions and retrofits determine the cost of controlling CO2 emissionsEnergy Policy, 2004
- Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy in the United States: Identifying Winners and Losers in an Expanded Permit Trading SystemThe Energy Journal, 2002
- WINDPOWER: A Turn of the Century ReviewAnnual Review of Energy and the Environment, 2000
- The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed-Preference ApproachAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor MarketsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1999
- What would it take to revitalize Nuclear Power in the United States?Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 1993