A Dynamic Model of Presidential Nomination Campaigns
- 1 September 1980
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 74 (3) , 651-669
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1958148
Abstract
Recent campaigns have demonstrated the importance of dynamic elements in affecting the selection of presidential nominees. This paper develops a mathematical model to analyze these dynamics. The heart of the model is the assumed relationship between the ability to acquire resources and success in primaries and caucuses. The expenditure of resources leads to greater electoral success, while greater electoral success (in particular, exceeding expectations in a primary or caucus) leads to greater resource-gathering capabilities. A difference equation model of these relationships is proposed. I prove that any campaign of this form is necessarily unstable, which implies that most candidates will be “winnowed out” necessarily, while only a very few, but at least one candidate, will necessarily “have momentum.” This result is true whether there are two or many contenders. However, I also argue that the larger the number of candidates, the stronger the dynamic forces, and thus the more rapid the “winnowing out” process.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Presidential Election GamePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2007
- Before the ConventionPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1980
- Race for the Presidency: The Media and the Nominating Process, by James David BarberPolitical Science Quarterly, 1979
- The Bandwagon CurveAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1977
- Winning the Presidential Nomination: National Polls and State Primary Elections, 1936-1972Public Opinion Quarterly, 1976
- The Making of the President, 1960International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 1961