Discriminability, response bias, and phoneme categories in discrimination of voice onset time
- 1 December 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 60 (6) , 1381-1389
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381231
Abstract
Signal detection methodology was employed in human subjects to distinguish between changes in discriminability and response bias and to reevaluate the role of phonetic categorization in the pheneme-boundary effect. A SAME-DIFFERENT discrimination task compared discrimination of 10 and 20 ms differences in voice onset time (VOT) in a synthetic stimulus continuum ranging from [ba] to [pa] (VOT''s from -50 to +70 ms). Both a clear increase in discriminability and a marked shift in response bias from SAME to DIFFERENT occurred near the voiced-voiceless boundary. When variations in VOT were isolated from syllable context so that they were not categorized as phonemes, discriminability increased near the voiced-voiceless boundary in a manner comparable to the full-syllable stimuli. The phoneme-boundary effect in VOT discrimination apparently reflects a genuine increase in discriminability near the phoneme boundary. The phoneme-boundary effect for VOT is probably not due exclusively to phonetic categorization but may instead reflect acoustic and auditory properties which are distinct from phonetic processing.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discrimination and labeling of noise–buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perceptionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976
- The ɛ‐Adjustment Procedure for Repeated‐Measures Analyses of VariancePsychophysiology, 1976