Evaluation of Reanalysis Soil Moisture Simulations Using Updated Chinese Soil Moisture Observations
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Vol. 6 (2) , 180-193
- https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm416.1
Abstract
Using 19 yr of Chinese soil moisture data from 1981 to 1999, the authors evaluate soil moisture in three reanalysis outputs: the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40); the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis 1 (R-1); and the NCEP–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis 2 (R-2) over China. R-2 shows improved interannual variability and better seasonal patterns of soil moisture than R-1 as the result of the incorporation of observed precipitation, but not for all stations. ERA-40 produces a better mean value of soil moisture for most Chinese stations and good interannual variability. Limited observations in the spring indicate a spring soil moisture peak for most of the stations. ERA-40 generally reproduced this event, while R-1 or R-2 generally did not capture this feature, either because the soil was already saturated or the deep soil layer was too thick and damped such a respon... Abstract Using 19 yr of Chinese soil moisture data from 1981 to 1999, the authors evaluate soil moisture in three reanalysis outputs: the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40); the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis 1 (R-1); and the NCEP–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis 2 (R-2) over China. R-2 shows improved interannual variability and better seasonal patterns of soil moisture than R-1 as the result of the incorporation of observed precipitation, but not for all stations. ERA-40 produces a better mean value of soil moisture for most Chinese stations and good interannual variability. Limited observations in the spring indicate a spring soil moisture peak for most of the stations. ERA-40 generally reproduced this event, while R-1 or R-2 generally did not capture this feature, either because the soil was already saturated or the deep soil layer was too thick and damped such a respon...This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison, Validation, and Transferability of Eight Multiyear Global Soil Wetness ProductsJournal of Hydrometeorology, 2004
- Using a Global Soil Wetness Dataset to Improve Seasonal Climate SimulationJournal of Climate, 2000
- Impact of Atmospheric Surface-layer Parameterizations in the new Land-surface Scheme of the NCEP Mesoscale Eta ModelBoundary-Layer Meteorology, 1997
- Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- The land surface‐atmosphere interaction: A review based on observational and global modeling perspectivesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- The Anomalous Rainfall over the United States during July 1993: Sensitivity to Land Surface Parameterization and Soil Moisture AnomaliesMonthly Weather Review, 1996
- Climate variability and land-surface processesAdvances in Water Resources, 1993
- A Global Climatology of Albedo, Roughness Length and Stomatal Resistance for Atmospheric General Circulation Models as Represented by the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB)Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1989
- Integration of Space and In Situ Observations to Study Global Climate ChangeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1988
- The Influence of Potential Evaporation on the Variabilities of Simulated Soil Wetness and ClimateJournal of Climate, 1988