Just What the Doctor Ordered. Review of the Evidence of the Impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry System on Medication Errors
- 26 June 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Health Services Research
- Vol. 43 (1p1) , 32-53
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00751.x
Abstract
Objective. To examine the association between computerization of physician orders and prescribing medication errors.Data Sources. Studies published in English language were identified through MEDLINE (1990 through December 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Of 252 identified in the search, 12 (4.8 percent) original investigations that compared rates of prescribing medication errors with handwritten and computerized physician orders were included.Data Collection. Information on study design, participant characteristics, clinical settings, and outcomes rates were abstracted independently by two investigators using a standardized protocol.Principal Findings. Compared with handwritten orders, 80 percent of studies (8/10 studies) reported a significant reduction in total prescribing errors, 43 percent in dosing errors (3/7 studies), and 37.5 percent in adverse drug events (3/8 studies). The use of computerized orders was associated with a 66 percent reduction in total prescribing errors in adults (odds ratio [OR]=0.34; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.52) and a positive tendency in children (p for interaction=.028). The benefit of computerized orders was larger when the rate of errors was more than 12 percent with handwritten orders (p for interaction=.022). Significant heterogeneity in the results compromised pooled relative risks. One randomized controlled intervention demonstrated the greatest benefits of computerized orders on total prescribing errors (OR=0.02, 95 percent CI 0.01–0.02) and dosing errors (OR=0.28; 95 percent CI 0.15–0.52) with 775 avoided prescribing errors (95 percent CI 752–811) per 1,000 orders in a pediatric hospital.Conclusions. Computerization of physicians' orders shows great promise. It will be more effective when linked to other computerized systems to detect and prevent prescribing errors.Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- Strategies to reduce medication errors with reference to older adultsNursing Standard, 2006
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJAMA, 2006
- Reducing Pediatric Medication ErrorsThe American Journal of Nursing, 2005
- The impact of hospitalwide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospitalJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 2003
- Immediate Benefits Realized Following Implementation of Physician Order Entry at an Academic Medical CenterJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2002
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986