Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 3 (1) , 25
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-25
Abstract
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined by symptoms and disability, has no confirmatory physical signs or characteristic laboratory abnormalities, and the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Difficulties with accurate case ascertainment contribute to this ignorance. Experienced investigators from around the world who are involved in CFS research met for a series of three day workshops in 2000, 2001 and 2002 intended to identify the problems in application of the current CFS case definition. The investigators were divided into focus groups and each group was charged with a topic. The investigators in each focus group relied on their own clinical and scientific knowledge, brainstorming within each group and with all investigators when focus group summaries were presented. Relevant literature was selected and reviewed independent of the workshops. The relevant literature was circulated via list-serves and resolved as being relevant by group consensus. Focus group reports were analyzed and compiled into the recommendations presented here. Ambiguities in the current CFS research definition that contribute to inconsistent case identification were identified. Recommendations for use of the definition, standardization of classification instruments and study design issues are presented that are intended to improve the precision of case ascertainment. The International CFS Study Group also identified ambiguities associated with exclusionary and comorbid conditions and reviewed the standardized, internationally applicable instruments used to measure symptoms, fatigue intensity and associated disability. This paper provides an approach to guide systematic, and hopefully reproducible, application of the current case definition, so that case ascertainment would be more uniform across sites. Ultimately, an operational CFS case definition will need to be based on empirical studies designed to delineate the possibly distinct biological pathways that result in chronic fatigue.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Detection and Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Depression with Neuropsychological TasksDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2001
- Defining Chronic Fatigue SyndromeJournal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 2000
- Measurement of prolonged fatigue in the working population: Determination of a cutoff point for the Checklist Individual Strength.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2000
- Prolonged Fatigue, Anxiety and Depression: Exploring Relationships in a Primary Care SampleAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
- Comparing the dis with the scid: Chronic fatigue syndrome and psychiatric comorbidityPsychology & Health, 1998
- Memory, attention, and executive function in chronic fatigue syndrome.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1996
- Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): A Factor Analytic Study of a Large Sample of Normal Elderly VolunteersDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 1994
- Development of a fatigue scaleJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Validation of the NIH activity record. A quantitative measure of life activitiesArthritis & Rheumatism, 1992