Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring: Contradictions Between Practice and Research
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
- Vol. 28 (4) , 409-416
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb02010.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Research Guidelines for Interpretation: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning WorkshopJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 1997
- Assessment Parameters and Indicators in Expert Intrapartal Nursing DecisionsJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 1996
- On intrapartum fetal monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Uncertain Value of Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Predicting Cerebral PalsyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A Guest EditorialObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1995
- Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Does a Nonreactive Fetal Heart Rate Pattern Really Mean Fetal Distress?American Journal of Perinatology, 1994
- Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoringjpme, 1991
- CEREBRAL PALSY AMONG CHILDREN BORN DURING THE DUBLIN RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAPARTUM MONITORINGThe Lancet, 1989
- What proportion of cerebral palsy is related to birth asphyxia?The Journal of Pediatrics, 1988