Flexion and Rotation of the Trunk and Lifting at Work Are Risk Factors for Low Back Pain
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 25 (23) , 3087-3092
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012010-00018
Abstract
A 3-year prospective cohort study among workers of 34 companies in the Netherlands. To investigate the relation between flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work and the occurrence of low back pain. Previous studies on work-related physical risk factors for low back pain either lacked quantification of the physical load or did not take confounding by individual and psychosocial factors into account. The study population consisted of 861 workers with no low back pain at baseline and complete data on the occurrence of low back pain during the 3-year follow-up period. Physical load at work was assessed by means of analyses of video-recordings. Information on other risk factors and the occurrence of low back pain was obtained by means of self-administered questionnaires. An increased risk of low back pain was observed for workers who worked with the trunk in a minimum of 60 degrees of flexion for more than 5% of the working time (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.1), for workers who worked with the trunk in a minimum of 30 degrees of rotation for more than 10% of the working time (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1. 9), and for workers who lifted a load of at least 25 kg more than 15 times per working day (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3). Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are moderate risk factors for low back pain, especially at greater levels of exposure.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptomsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Linear and nonlinear relations between psychosocial job characteristics, subjective outcomes, and sickness absence: Baseline results from SMASH.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2000
- Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1998
- Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testingInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Disability Resulting From Occupational Low Back PainSpine, 1996
- Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disordersScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1996
- Odds Ratio or Relative Risk for Cross-Sectional Data?International Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1993
- Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1991
- A Prospective Study of Work Perceptions and Psychosocial Factors Affecting the Report of Back InjurySpine, 1991