Ventricular Fibrillation Survivors in whom Tachyarrhythmia Cannot Be Induced: Outcome Related to Selected Therapy
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 10 (6) , 1291-1300
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb04965.x
Abstract
Eight-five patients were studied to determine the prognosis of the ventricular tachyarrhythmias at the time of electrophysiologic study. Twenty-five patients (29%) were not inducible when we used a stimulation protocol consisting of up to four extrastimuli delivered at two right ventricular sites. Patients with no inducible arrhythmias were younger (53 vs 59 yrs; p = .06) and had higher ejection fractions (.49 vs .34; p less than .04) than the inducible ventricular fibrillation survivors. Sex, cardiac diagnosis, time from event to electrophysiologic study, and antiarrhythmic therapy at the time of event did not discriminate between those with and those without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Survival free of recurrent sudden death or ventricular tachycardia was .86 +/- .05 and .95 +/- .05 for patients with and without inducible tachyarrhythmias, respectively (p = .22). Nine of 25 (36%) patients with no inducible arrhythmias developed inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias when testing was repeated with an antiarrhythmic drug. Ventricular fibrillation survivors not inducible at the time of programmed ventricular stimulation (using a stimulation protocol consisting of four extrastimuli delivered at two right ventricular sites) seem to have a good prognosis. Many "noninducible" patients develop inducible tachyarrhythmias when placed on antiarrhythmic therapy. Because it is possible that these drugs are proarrhythmic, empiric antiarrhythmic therapy should be avoided in these patients.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: what is the significance of induced arrhythmias and what is the correct stimulation protocol?Circulation, 1985
- The arrhythmogenicity of antiarrhythmic agentsAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- Clinical significance of ventricular fibrillation-flutter induced by ventricular programmed stimulationAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- Significance of ventricular arrhythmias initiated by programmed ventricular stimulation: the importance of the type of ventricular arrhythmia induced and the number of premature stimuli required.Circulation, 1984
- Antiarrhythmic Drugs: a Possible Cause of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Ambulatory arrhythmias in resuscitated victims of cardiac arrest.Circulation, 1982
- Aggravation and provocation of ventricular arrhythmias by antiarrhythmic drugs.Circulation, 1982
- Nonclinical polymorphic ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed cardiac stimulation: incidence, mechanisms and clinical significance.Circulation, 1980
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest: comparison of effects on chronic ventricular arrhythmias and recurrent cardiac arrest.Circulation, 1979