Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients
Top Cited Papers
- 15 March 2011
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 29 (6) , 947-953
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21308
Abstract
The patient‐reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank v1 (PPFIB) contains 124 item response theory (IRT) calibrated items (Rose et al. 2008. J Clin Epidemiol 61:17–33). We report the psychometric properties of these items within an outpatient, orthopaedic patient population. In particular, we investigated whether a single unidimensional IRT scale can adequately define physical function of patients presenting with primarily upper or lower extremity orthopaedic complaints. We conducted a prospective study at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic to collect data from 865 adult patients with all 124 PROMIS physical function items and seven demographic items. Items were evaluated by a Rasch model. Total variance (60.6%) across the 124 items was explained by a single Rasch dimension. The variance explained by the second dimension was 7.7%, reflecting differential item functioning in the upper and lower extremity patients. The upper extremity physical function items had a pronounced ceiling effect. A single physical function dimension accounts for most of the item variance in the PPFIB, suggesting that the items are measuring predominately one single construct. Separate subscales for lower versus upper extremities, especially with additional items at the upper trait level of the upper extremity subscale, may further enhance evaluation of physical function in orthopaedic patients. © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:947–953Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment CenterSMQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Firestar: Computerized Adaptive Testing Simulation Program for Polytomous Item Response Theory ModelsApplied Psychological Measurement, 2009
- Clinical Interpretation of a Lower-Extremity Functional Scale–Derived Computerized Adaptive TestPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2009
- What constitutes progress in assessing patient outcomes?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Clinical Interpretation of Computerized Adaptive Test–Generated Outcome Measures in Patients With Knee ImpairmentsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2009
- Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Published by Elsevier ,2008
- The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Medical Care, 2007
- The Effect of Uncertainty of Item Parameter Estimation on Ability EstimatesPsychometrika, 1990
- Adaptive testing by computer.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1985
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980