Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery After Ischemic Stroke
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
- Vol. 22 (1) , 64-71
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305302
Abstract
Background. Motor recovery after stroke is predicted only moderately by clinical variables, implying that there is still a substantial amount of unexplained, biologically meaningful variability in recovery. Regression diagnostics can indicate whether this is associated simply with Gaussian error or instead with multiple subpopulations that vary in their relationships to the clinical variables. Objective. To perform regression diagnostics on a linear model for recovery versus clinical predictors. Methods. Forty-one patients with ischemic stroke were studied. Impairment was assessed using the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Motor recovery was defined as the change in the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score from 24 to 72 hours after stroke to 3 or 6 months later. The clinical predictors in the model were age, gender, infarct location (subcortical vs cortical), diffusion weighted imaging infarct volume, time to reassessment, and acute upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Regression diagnostics included a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for Gaussian errors and a test for outliers using Studentized deleted residuals. Results. In the random sample, clinical variables explained only 47% of the variance in recovery. Among the patients with the most severe initial impairment, there was a set of regression outliers who recovered very poorly. With the outliers removed, explained variance in recovery increased to 89%, and recovery was well approximated by a proportional relationship with initial impairment (recovery ≅ 0.70 × initial impairment). Conclusions. Clinical variables only moderately predict motor recovery. Regression diagnostics demonstrated the existence of a subpopulation of outliers with severe initial impairment who show little recovery. When these outliers were removed, clinical variables were good predictors of recovery among the remaining patients, showing a tight proportional relationship to initial impairment.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recovery of the upper limb post ischaemic stroke and the predictive value of the Orpington Prognostic ScoreClinical Rehabilitation, 2004
- Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper LimbStroke, 2003
- The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement PropertiesNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2002
- Determinação volumetrica do infarto cerebral na fase aguda usando tomografia computadorizada de crânio sem contraste: estudo comparando três métodosArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 2001
- Reproducibility of Measurements of Cerebral Infarct Volume on CT ScansStroke, 2001
- Predicting motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examinationPhysiotherapy Research International, 2000
- The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up studyDisability and Rehabilitation, 1999
- Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke studyArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1994
- Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements.Stroke, 1992
- The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1983