The Historiography of the Peruvian Guerrilla Movement, 1960-1965
- 1 January 1973
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Latin American Research Review
- Vol. 8 (1) , 45-70
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100020434
Abstract
Peru has a Durable Tradition of Peasant Rebellion, Most Recently Described by José Matos Mar (1967) and Oscar Cornblit (1970), which dates far back to the eighteenth century movements led by Juan Santos Atahuallpa and José Gabriel Túpac Amaru. Twentieth century guerrilla leaders have tried to identify with this tradition by echoing their predecessors' concern for the Indians' right to work their own land and to be free from exploitation. They have named their fronts for Túpac Amaru, Pumacahua, Pachacutec, and other native revolutionaries of an earlier era, and they have proposed fundamental changes in Peruvian society, notably agrarian reform, in a conscious effort to complete a struggle that has gone on for more than two centuries to secure land and dignity for campesinos.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nationalism and Capitalism in PeruMonthly Review, 1971
- Revolutionary Nationalism in PeruForeign Affairs, 1971
- Crisis política y populismo militar en el PerúRevista Mexicana de Sociologia, 1970
- A Case of Neo-Feudalism: La Convención, PeruJournal of Latin American Studies, 1969
- Debray: The Strength and the WeaknessMonthly Review, 1968
- Peru's Postponed RevolutionWorld Politics, 1968
- Revolution in the Revolution?Monthly Review, 1967
- Problems of Development in PeruJournal of Inter-American Studies, 1967
- Peking and the Latin American CommunistsThe China Quarterly, 1967
- Andes and Sierra MaestraMonthly Review, 1962