Sperm structure and phylogeny of Astigmata
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Morphology
- Vol. 265 (3) , 318-324
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10361
Abstract
The Astigmata, a large and variable group, is still a subject of taxonomic dispute. Particularly, their origin from ancestors of the lower oribatid mites (e.g., Malaconothroidea) seems well documented by many lines of evidence. The structure of spermatozoa has been successfully applied to phylogenetic investigations in many animal groups. The aim of our study was to provide new data on spermatozoon structure in Astigmata and to consider its appropriateness in phylogenetic studies. The study reveals information on spermatozoa in 17 species of Astigmata (11 species studied for the first time) extending our knowledge to 18 species (one species known only from the literature) representing 12 families and 7 superfamilies. Spermatozoa have the same basic structure in all species: cells are multiform and the chromatin forms thin threads embedded directly in the cytoplasm; the acrosome is absent. The cytoplasm in most species contains electron‐dense lamellae, varying in both number and arrangement within the cell. In Sarcoptoidea, electron‐dense tubules in contact with lamellae margins were also observed in Psoroptidae (Psoroptes equi), whereas in two representatives of Sarcoptidae (Notoedres cati and Sarcoptes scabiei), only electron‐dense tubules were found. In two species, Canestrinia sellnicki (Canestrinioidea: Canestriniidae) and Scutulanyssus obscurus (Analgoidea: Pteronyssidae), neither lamellae nor tubules were present. The mitochondria in a spermatozoon are usually gathered at the cell periphery and their structure is usually modified to form so‐called mitochondrial derivatives. The chromatin threads are an autapomorphy strongly supporting the monophyly of Astigmata. As spermatozoa vary considerably between species in Astigmata, we deduce that sperm structure may be useful for phylogenetic analyses within the group. Several conclusions concerning the affinities within Astigmata are presented. Spermatology seems to be unhelpful, however, in questions on the origin of Astigmata (particularly for Astigmata–Oribatida relationships), since their sperm do not possess synapomorphies with sperm of the remaining groups of Acariformes, i.e., Endeostigmata, Prostigmata, and Oribatida. J. Morphol.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Male genital system and spermiogenesis ofNanorchestes amphibius(Acari: Endeostigmata: Nanorchestidae): Anatomy, histology, and evolutionary implicationsJournal of Morphology, 2003
- Morphological evidence for the evolutionary origin of Astigmata (Acari: Acariformes)Published by Springer Nature ,1999
- Phylogenetic Perspectives on Genetic Systems and Reproductive Modes of MitesPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- Ultrastructure of the reproductive system of the house dust mitesDermatophagoides farinae andD. pteronyssinus (Acari, Pyroglyphidae) with remarks on spermatogenesis and oogenesisExperimental and Applied Acarology, 1992
- Anatomy and ultrastructure of the reproductive systems ofAcarus siro (Acari: Acaridae)Experimental and Applied Acarology, 1990
- THE SPERMATOZOA OF THE POLYCHAETA (ANNELIDA): AN ULTRASTRUCTURAL REVIEWBiological Reviews, 1989
- Fine structure of spermatozoa of some labidognath spiders (Filistatidae, Segestriidae, Dysderidae, Oonopidae, Scytodidae, Pholcidae; Araneae; Arachnida) with remarks on spermiogenesisJournal of Morphology, 1985
- Unusual structural changes in mitochondria during spermiogenesis in the oribatid mite, Hafenrefferia gilvipes (Acari)Cell and tissue research, 1982
- Spermiogenesis and structure of spermatozoa in the oribatid mite,Hafenrefferia gilvipes(C.L. Koch) (Acari, Oribatida)International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction, 1982
- An unusual membrane organization observed during spermiogenesis in the mite Caloglyphus anomalusJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1971