Effects of Employment Relationship, Response of Recipient and Sex of Rater on Perceptions of Sexual Harassment
- 1 August 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 65 (1) , 55-63
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1987.65.1.55
Abstract
The effects of the employment relationship (superior vs coworker), recipient's response (positive vs negative), and sex of the rater (male vs female) on perceptions of sexual harassment, appropriateness of the initiator's behavior, and appropriateness of the recipient's behavior were investigated. Subjects were 82 female and 76 male undergraduate students. The results of a 2 × 2 × 2 multivariate analysis of variance indicated main effects for response of the recipient and sex of the rater. Univariate analyses indicated that women rated the initiator less favorably than men, that men perceived the situation as more harassing and approved of the recipient more than women when the recipient's responses were positive, although there was no difference between men and women when the recipient's responses were negative.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex differences, communication consistency, and judgments of sexual harassment in a performance appraisal interviewSouthern Speech Communication Journal, 1985
- Women in a Man's World: Sexual HarassmentHuman Relations, 1985
- Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work settingJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1983
- Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual HarassmentJournal of Social Issues, 1982
- Sex‐Ratios, Sex‐Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at WorkJournal of Social Issues, 1982
- The Factorial Survey: An Approach to Defining Sexual Harassment on CampusJournal of Social Issues, 1982
- Sexual Harassment in the Workplace as a Function of Initiator's Status: The Case of Airline PersonnelJournal of Social Issues, 1982
- Beyond Nine to Five: IntroductionJournal of Social Issues, 1982
- Sexuality and the WorkplaceBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1980
- Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970