Marketing Genetic Tests: Empowerment or Snake Oil?
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Education & Behavior
- Vol. 32 (5) , 676-685
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198105278825
Abstract
Genetic tests are currently being offered to the general public with little oversight and regulation as to which tests are allowed to be sold clinically and little control over the marketing and promotion of sales and use. This article provides discussion and data to indicate that the general public holds high opinions of genetic testing and that current media outlets for public education on genetic testing are not adequate to increase accurate knowledge of genetics. The authors argue that more regulation is needed to control and correct this problem in the United States.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breast cancer risk counseling improves women’s functioningPatient Education and Counseling, 2004
- Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papersCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Achieving utility with family history: Colorectal cancer riskAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003
- Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clinical Genetic TestingJAMA, 2002
- Creating Needs?Public Health Genomics, 2001
- What is 'public opinion' about genetics?Nature Reviews Genetics, 2001
- Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancerAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 2000
- Educational material about genetic tests: Does it provide key information for patients and practitioners?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- The Lifetime Risk of Developing Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physiciansThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982