Abstract
The difference in processing behavior between synthetic rubbers and natural rubber becomes evident when production facilities designed for processing natural rubber are used for synthetic rubbers. All the synthetic rubbers in one respect or another are harder to process than natural rubber. Under circumstances other than the present emergency, processing equipment suitable for handling the synthetic rubbers would gradually be evolved. In the present situation, synthetic rubbers must be processed with equipment already available. In this discussion natural rubber and the general purpose synthetic rubbers, GR-S, GR-M and GR-I, will be considered. The processing of dry rubber consists essentially of the incorporation of vulcanizing agents, pigments, oils, and other ingredients by a process of kneading, followed by the forming of the mix by extrusion or calendering into shapes suitable for fabrication preparatory to final cure. The mixing step, which is accomplished on a two-roll mill or in an internal mixer, requires that the rubber be within a plasticity range that will permit satisfactory dispersion of the ingredients. If the plasticity is too low the rubber tends to crumble, and if it is too high dispersion is poor. Crude natural rubber is quite tough, and before breakdown has some of the properties of vulcanized rubber, such as high recovery after moderate distortion. In the crude state it is extremely difficult to obtain satisfactory dispersion of pigments. It is therefore necessary to soften it by mastication or other means so that the pigments are more readily incorporated and power requirements are lowered. In addition, its nerve or tendency to recover after distortion is greatly reduced. Synthetic rubbers, in general, differ from natural rubber in their susceptibility to softening by mastication, and they show different relationships between nerve and plasticity than does natural rubber.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: