MELD / PELD and the allocation of deceased donor livers for status 1 recipients with acute fulminant hepatic failure, primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, and acute Wilson’s disease
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 10 (Supplement) , S17-S22
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20273
Abstract
Key Points 1 Historical perspective of donor allocation to patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). 2 Predicting prognosis in patients with FHF using the London and Clichy criteria. 3 Model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) is a predictor of mortality in patients with FHF. 4 Outcomes of adults listed as Status 1 in the United States. 5 Outcomes of pediatric candidates listed as Status 1 in the United States. 6 Proposed redefinition for Status 1 in adult and pediatric candidates. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:S17–S22.)Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- MELD score as a predictor of pretransplant and posttransplant survival in OPTN/UNOS status 1 patientsHepatology, 2004
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: The MELD impactLiver Transplantation, 2004
- Use and validation of selection criteria for liver transplantation in acute liver failureLiver Transplantation, 2000
- Use and validation of selection criteria for liver transplantation in acute liver failureLiver Transplantation, 2000
- Emergency liver transplantation for acute liver failure: Evaluation of London and Clichy criteriaJournal of Hepatology, 1993
- Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failureGastroenterology, 1989