Sensitivity of HCV RNA and HIV RNA blood screening assays
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 42 (5) , 527-536
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00101.x
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The FDA requirement for sensitivity of viral NAT methods used in blood screening is a 95‐percent detection limit of 100 copies per mL, whereas the NAT screening system should have a sensitivity of at least 5000 copies per mL per individual donation. According to the Common Technical Specifications of the European Directive 98/79/EC for in vitro diagnostics, viral standard dilutions (calibrated against the WHO standard) should be tested at least 24 times for a statistically valid assessment of the 95‐percent detection limit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Viral standard dilution panels (PeliCheck, VQC‐CLB) were prepared for HCV RNA genotypes 1 and 3 and for HIV RNA genotypes B and E. In a multicenter study, 23 laboratories tested the panels all together in 8 to 91 test runs per NAT method. RESULTS: The following 95‐percent detection limits (and 95% CIs) were found on the HCV RNA genotype 1 reference panels (shown as geq/mL): Gen‐Probe TMA, 85 (64‐118); AmpliScreen, 126 (83‐225); AmpliScreen with NucliSens Extractor, 21 (13‐44); Amplicor with NucliSens Extractor, 69 (50‐102), and Amplicor with Qiagen extraction technology, 144 (74‐102). On HIV RNA genotype B dilution panels, the following 95‐percent detection limits were found (shown as geq/mL): Gen‐Probe TMA, 31 (20‐52); AmpliScreen, 126 (67‐311); AmpliScreen with NucliSens Extractor, 37 (23‐69), and NucliSens QL assay, 123 (51‐566). HIV RNA genotype E panels were detected with equal sensitivity as HIV RNA genotype B panels. In the Gen‐Probe TMA assay, the 50‐percent detection limits on HIV RNA type B and type E were 3.6 (2.6‐5.0) and 3.9 (2.4‐5.8) geq per mL, respectively. The HCV RNA genotype 1 and 3 standards were detected with equal sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The differences in sensitivity between NAT assays can be explained by the input of isolated viral nucleic acid in the amplification reactions. The FDA requirements for sensitivity of NAT blood screening assays can be met by the Gen‐probe TMA, as well as by the AmpliScreen assays, particularly when combined with the NucliSens Extractor.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishment of the first World Health Organization International Standard for human parvovirus B19 DNA nucleic acid amplification techniquesVox Sanguinis, 2002
- Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screeningVox Sanguinis, 2001
- An international collaborative study to establish the 1st international standard for HIV-1 RNA for use in nucleic acid-based techniquesJournal of Virological Methods, 2001
- An international collaborative study to establish a World Health Organization international standard for hepatitis B virus DNA nucleic acid amplification techniquesVox Sanguinis, 2001
- Calibration of HCV Working Reagents for NAT Assays against the HCV International StandardVox Sanguinis, 2000
- Nucleic acid amplification testing of hepatitis B virusThe Lancet, 2000
- Establishment of the First International Standard for Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology (NAT) Assays for HCV RNAVox Sanguinis, 1999
- International collaborative study on the second EUROHEP HCV-RNA reference panelJournal of Virological Methods, 1996
- Preparation and Characterization of RNA Standards for Use in Quantitative Branched DNA Hybridization AssaysAnalytical Biochemistry, 1995
- Reliability of polymerase chain reaction for detection of hepatitis C virusThe Lancet, 1993