Plant Growth with Artificial Sources of Radiant Energy
- 1 October 1947
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Plant Physiology
- Vol. 22 (4) , 494-513
- https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.22.4.494
Abstract
Comparative growth responses of certain herbaceous annuals to several sources of artificial radiant energy were investigated. The sources included un-filtered incandescent, water filtered incandescent, high pressure mercury arc lamps, and white and daylight fluorescent. The plant material irradiated was: China aster, variety Heart of France; spinach, variety Nobel; soybean, variety Biloxi; and tomato, var. Indiana Baltimore. The studies were made at 15[degree], 20[degree], and 25[degree]C and at varying photoperiods. The greatest height and fresh and dry wt. occurred with the incandescent sources. The water-filtered incandescent condition often produced taller plants with a lower percentage of dry wt. than the unfiltered incandescent. The shortest plants, with the smallest fresh and dry wts., occurred with the high pressure mercury arc lamp. Removing the 3654 A line in the near u.-v. spectrum of the mercury arc lamp failed to produce any significant increase in growth, indicating that this line is not responsible for the poor growth with this source. When the incandescent and mercury sources were set up in a single plot so that there were varying percentages of mercury and incandescent radiation, the height and wt. decreased as the % of mercury radiant energy was increased. The plants under the fluorescent lamps were of an intermediate type of growth which was vigorous and stocky except at 15[degree]. It appears that the differences in growth responses obtained with the various sources can be correlated principally with the differences in the respective spectral characteristics of the lamps.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- RADIANT ENERGY NOMENCLATUREPlant Physiology, 1943
- Effects of Light Quality on Growth and Mineral Nutrition of BeanBotanical Gazette, 1942
- Responses by Tomato Plants to Artificial IlluminationBotanical Gazette, 1937
- Some Effects of Artificial Climates on the Growth and Chemical Composition of PlantsAmerican Journal of Botany, 1930
- A Physiological Study of the Effect of Light of Various Ranges of Wave Length on the Growth of PlantsAmerican Journal of Botany, 1926