Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
Open Access
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 85 (3) , 355-358
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x
Abstract
Background: The most important surgical complication following rectal resection with anastomosis is symptomatic anastomotic leakage, which is associated with a 6–22 per cent mortality rate. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum. Methods: From 1980 to 1995, 272 consecutive anterior resections for rectal cancer were performed by the same surgical team; 131 anastomoses were situated 5 cm or less from the anal verge. The associations between clinical anastomotic leakage and 19 patient-, tumour-, surgical- and treatment-related variables were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The rate of clinical anastomotic leakage was 12 per cent (32 of 272). Multivariate analysis of the overall population showed that only male sex and level of anastomosis were independent factors for development of anastomotic leakage. The risk of leakage was 6·5 times higher for anastomoses situated less than 5 cm from the anal verge than for those situated above 5 cm; it was 2·7 times higher for men than for women. In a second analysis of low anastomoses (5 cm or less from the anal verge; n = 131), obesity was statistically associated with leakage. Conclusion: A protective stoma is suitable after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer for anastomoses situated at or less than 5 cm from the anal verge, particularly for men and obese patients.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling techniqueDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995
- Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Safety of double-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Flush aortic tie versus selective preservation of the ascending left colic artery in low anterior resection for rectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safetyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Double versus single stapling technique in rectal anastomosisInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1992
- Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEATM stapling deviceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1987
- Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: A prospective randomized trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- The low stapled anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.BMJ, 1980