Is rhythm control superior to rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure?
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 94 (6) , 797-800
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Recurrent Persistent Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation—Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Dofetilide in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Left Ventricular DysfunctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1996
- Amiodarone in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Asymptomatic Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Effects of Prophylactic Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1993
- Effect of the Antiarrhythmic Agent Moricizine on Survival after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Mortality and Morbidity in Patients Receiving Encainide, Flecainide, or PlaceboNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989