Abstract
A central dogma of computer science is that the Turing‐machine model is the appropriate abstraction of a digital computer.Physicists who've thought about the matter also seem to favor the Turing‐machine model. For example, Roger Penrose devoted some 60 pages of a book to a description of this abstract model of computation and its implications. I argue here that physicists should consider the real‐number model of computation as more appropriate and useful for scientific computation. Physicists should consider an alternative to the Turing‐machine model of computation.

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit: