Bronchodilator treatment in moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis: continuous or on demand? A randomised controlled study.
- 7 December 1991
- Vol. 303 (6815) , 1426-1431
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1426
Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To examine the effect of bronchodilator treatment given continuously versus on demand on the progression of asthma and chronic bronchitis and to compare the long term effects of a beta 2 adrenergic drug (salbutamol) and an anticholinergic drug (ipratropium bromide). DESIGN--Two year randomised controlled prospective 'crossover' study in which patients were assigned to one of two parallel treatment groups receiving continuous treatment or treatment on demand. SETTING--29 general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen. PATIENTS--223 patients aged greater than or equal to 30 with moderate airway obstruction due to asthma or chronic bronchitis, selected by their general practitioners. INTERVENTIONS--1600 micrograms salbutamol or 160 micrograms ipratropium bromide daily (113 patients) or salbutamol or ipratropium bromide only during exacerbations or periods of dyspnoea (110). No other pulmonary treatment was permitted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Decline in ventilatory function and change in bronchial responsiveness, respiratory symptoms, number of exacerbations, and quality of life. RESULTS--Among 144 patients completing the study, after correction for possible confounding factors the decline in forced expiratory volume in one second was -0.072 l/year in continuously treated patients and -0.020 l/year in those treated on demand (p less than 0.05), irrespective of the drug. The difference in the decline in patients with asthma was comparable with that in patients with chronic bronchitis (asthma: 0.092 v -0.025 l/year; chronic bronchitis: -0.082 v -0.031 l/year). Bronchial responsiveness increased slightly (0.4 doubling dose) with continuous treatment in chronic bronchitis, but exacerbations, symptoms, and quality of life were unchanged. Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide had comparable effects on all variables investigated. CONCLUSIONS--Continuous bronchodilator treatment without anti-inflammatory treatment accelerates decline in ventilatory function. Bronchodilators should be used only on demand, with additional corticosteroid treatment, if necessary.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- β2-agonists in asthmaThe Lancet, 1991
- Increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness after inhaling salbutamol during 1 year is not caused by subsensitization to salbutamol1Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1990
- Comparison of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine3(Serotonin) Antagonist Ondansetron (Gr 38032F) with High-Dose Metoclopramide in the Control of Cisplatin-Induced EmesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Treatment of Patients with Airflow Obstruction by General Practitioners and Chest Physicians:Study of Pharmacotherapy of Chronic Non-Specific Lung Disease Supported by the Dutch Asthma Foundation (86.28)Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 1989
- The Course and Prognosis of Different Forms of Chronic Airways Obstruction in a Sample from the General PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Use of anti-asthma drugs in New Zealand.Thorax, 1987
- 75 deaths in asthmatics prescribed home nebulisers.BMJ, 1987
- Emesis due to cancer chemotherapy: Results of a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial of varying doses of metoclopramide in the management of cis-platinum-induced vomitingEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Dexamethasone and high dose metoclopramide: efficacy in controlling cisplatin induced nausea and vomiting.BMJ, 1984
- The Comparison of Success Rates in Cross-Over Trials in the Presence of an Order EffectJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1981